ECDC’s assessment of each country’s epidemiological situation derives from a composite score based on the absolute value and trend of five weekly COVID-19 epidemiological indicators. As shown below, for week 30, the epidemiological situation in the EU/EEA overall was categorised as of moderate concern (the same as the previous week). Two countries were categorised as of high concern, 12 countries as of moderate concern, eight countries as of low concern and eight countries as of very low concern.
Ensemble model forecasts produced for each EU/EEA country on 2 August 2021 by the European COVID-19 Forecast Hub provide predictions for weeks 31 to 32. During this period and compared to the current week, stable trends in COVID-19 cases and deaths are forecast, reaching 224.0 cases per 100 000 population and 6.9 deaths per million population, by the end of week 32. At the country level, increasing trends in cases are forecast for 17 countries (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Romania and Sweden) and increasing trends in deaths are forecast for three countries (France, Greece and Spain). Note that the uncertainty present in these forecasts, not shown here, increases the further ahead predictions are made.
By the end of week 30, the median of cumulative uptake of at least one vaccine dose among adults aged 18 years and above was 72.8% (country range: 19.2–91.2%). The median of cumulative uptake of full vaccination among adults aged 18 years and above was 59.8% (country range: 17.3–86.5%).
The estimated distribution (median and range of values from 14 countries) of variants of concern was 89.6% (52.3–99.0%) for B.1.617.2 (Delta), 5.6% (0.0–17.3%) for B.1.1.7 (Alpha), 0.1% (0.0–4.2%) for B.1.351 (Beta), 0.0% (0.0–1.7%) for P.1 (Gamma) and 0.0% (0.0–0.5%) for B.1.1.7+E484K.
The current epidemiological situation, characterised by a high number of reported of cases, is expected to continue given the ongoing increase in the occurrence of the Delta variant, which has now been dominant in the EU/EEA for some weeks. To date, the highest notification rates have been reported among younger age groups. However, increases in cases in older age groups, as well as increases in COVID-19 hospitalisation indicators, have also been observed in several countries.
Intensity of COVID-19 in the EU/EEA as of week 30
Case notification rates
Testing rates and test positivity
Notification rates are dependent on several factors, one of which is the testing rate. The weekly testing rates for the EU/EEA for week 30, based on pooled data reported by 30 countries, was 3 774 per 100 000 population (country range: 478–45 966), compared to 3 522 (country range: 478–59 219) in week 29. This pooled rate has been stable for nine weeks.
Pooled test positivity for the EU/EEA for week 30 was 2.8% (country range: 0.1–14.2%), compared to 3.0% (country range: 0.1–14.3%) in week 29. This indicator has been stable for two weeks. Test positivity was <2 % in 16 countries, 2–<4 % in nine countries, 4–<10 % in four countries (Estonia, France, Ireland and Sweden) and 10 % or higher in one country (Spain). Increasing trends were observed in six countries.
Severity of COVID-19 in the EU/EEA as of week 30
Case notification rates in people 65 years and older
Rates of hospitalisation and ICU admission and occupancy
The hospital admission rate for the EU/EEA, based on data reported by 25 countries, was 2.1 per 100 000 population (country range: 0.0–17.6), compared to 2.6 (country range: 0.0–24.8) in week 29. This pooled rate has been stable for nine weeks. As a percentage of each country’s pandemic peak, this rate was <10 % in 18 countries, 10–<25 % in five countries (France, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands and Portugal), 25–<50 % in one country (Iceland) and 50 % or higher in one country (Cyprus). Increasing trends (of duration in weeks) were observed in four countries (France (one), Iceland (one), Lithuania (one) and Malta (one)).
The hospital occupancy rate (mean daily occupancy in the last week per 100 000 population) for the EU/EEA, based on data reported by 23 countries, was 4.6 per 100 000 population (country range: 0.4–32.2), compared to 5.6 (country range: 0.4–28.2) in week 29. This pooled rate has been decreasing for one week. As a percentage of each country’s pandemic peak, this rate was <25 % in 22 countries and 75 % or higher in one country (Cyprus). Increasing trends (of duration in weeks) were observed in four countries (Cyprus (six), Iceland (one), Luxembourg (one) and the Netherlands (two)).
The ICU admission rate for the EU/EEA, based on data reported by 13 countries, was 0.7 per 100 000 population (country range: 0.1–3.4), compared to 0.5 (country range: 0.0–2.8) in week 29. This pooled rate has been increasing for two weeks. As a percentage of each country’s pandemic peak, this rate was <10 % in seven countries, 10–<25 % in four countries (France, Greece, Ireland and the Netherlands), 25–<50 % in one country (Malta) and 50 % or higher in one country (Cyprus). Increasing trends (of duration in weeks) were observed in five countries (Cyprus (one), France (one), Greece (two), Malta (one) and the Netherlands (two)).
The ICU occupancy rate for the EU/EEA, based on data reported by 16 countries, was 0.8 per 100 000 population (country range: 0.1–4.5), compared to 1.0 (country range: 0.0–3.1) in week 29. This pooled rate has been decreasing for one week. As a percentage of each country’s pandemic peak, this rate was <25 % in 15 countries and 75 % or higher in one country (Cyprus). Increasing trends (of duration in weeks) were observed in five countries (Cyprus (four), France (one), Ireland (one), the Netherlands (one) and Portugal (one)).
Mortality
Sequencing capacity varies greatly across the EU/EEA. ECDC uses data reported to the GISAID EpiCoV database or The European Surveillance System (TESSy) to estimate the distribution of variants in countries reporting an adequate average weekly volume of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases sequenced (to estimate the proportion with sufficient precision for a variant prevalence of 5% or lower). Due to reporting delays in many countries a two-week window excluding the most recent week (weeks 28 to 29, 12 July to 25 July 2021) was used.
In this period, 14 countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia and Spain) reported an adequate average weekly sequencing volume (five with sufficient precision at a variant prevalence of 1% or lower, seven with sufficient precision at a variant prevalence of >1% to 2.5% and two with sufficient precision at a variant prevalence of >2.5% to 5%), 12 countries reported an inadequate sequencing volume without sufficient precision at a variant prevalence of 5% and four did not report any data.
Among the 14 countries with an adequate sequencing volume in this period, the median (range) of the VOC reported in all samples sequenced was 89.6% (52.3–99.0%) for B.1.617.2 (Delta), 5.6% (0.0–17.3%) for B.1.1.7 (Alpha), 0.1% (0.0–4.2%) for B.1.351 (Beta), 0.0% (0.0–1.7%) for P.1 (Gamma) and 0.0% (0.0–0.5%) for B.1.1.7+E484K.
The median (range) of the VOI reported in all samples sequenced in the period for these 14 countries was 0.0% (0.0–1.5%) for B.1.617.1 (Kappa), 0.0% (0.0–1.0%) for B.1.621, 0.0% (0.0–0.6%) for B.1.525 (Eta), 0.0% (0.0–0.1%) for B.1.617.3, 0.0% (0.0–0.1%) for B.1.620 and 0.0% (0.0–0.0%) for C.37 (Lambda)
Based on data reported to TESSy from eight countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, France, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Sweden), in week 30, the pooled incidence of COVID-19 cases among long-term care facility (LTCF) residents was 53.3 per 100 000 LTCF beds, the pooled incidence of fatal COVID-19 cases was 4.7 per 100 000 LTCF beds, and 6.6% of participating LTCFs reported one or more new COVID-19 cases among their residents.
Comparing week 30 to weeks 26 to 29, the trends in the incidence of confirmed cases and fatal cases, and the proportion of affected LTCFs, were as follows:
For confirmed COVID-19 cases, four countries (Belgium, Croatia, Lithuania and Luxembourg) reported a decrease (a relative rate decrease of at least 10%, or an absolute decrease of 10 cases per 100 000 beds) and four countries (Austria, France, the Netherlands and Sweden) reported an increase.
For fatal COVID-19 cases, three countries (Austria, Lithuania and Sweden) reported a decrease (a relative rate decrease of at least 10%, or an absolute decrease of 10 fatal cases per 100 000 beds) and four countries (Belgium, Croatia, Luxembourg and the Netherlands) reported an increase.
For the proportion of LTCFs that reported one or more new COVID-19 case, two countries (Belgium and the Netherlands) reported an increase (at least 10% relative increase) and two countries (Croatia and Lithuania) reported a decrease (at least 10% relative decrease).
ECDC produces two weekly COVID-19 surveillance outputs (the COVID-19 country overview and the COVID-19 surveillance report) using data from a range of sources. The data behind most of the figures in the COVID-19 country overview are available for download in open data formats on ECDC’s website.
ECDC’s weekly epidemiological score is derived from a combination of the absolute value and trend of intensity indicators (test positivity and total case notification rates) and severity indicators (case rates among people aged 65 years and older, hospital or ICU admissions or occupancy and death rates). The final score between 1 and 10 is split evenly into quintiles to produce the categories used. A higher score indicates an epidemiological situation of greater concern. The method is described in Annex 2 of the 15th update of ECDC’s Risk Assessment for COVID-19.
The joint ECDC-WHO Europe COVID-19 surveillance bulletin is published every Friday, comprising an overview of data reported to TESSy by countries in the WHO European Region and an interactive web application presenting country-level data.
Additional weekly surveillance bulletins relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe include EuroMOMO (estimates of all-cause mortality) and Flu News Europe (including primary care sentinel and hospital-based surveillance for respiratory disease), which are published every Thursday and Friday, respectively.
A list of current variants of concern and variants of interest for the EU/EEA is published on ECDC’s website. Data used in this report from the GISAID EpiCoV database were extracted on 28 July 2021. B.1.617 was recoded to B.1.617.2 (Delta) for TESSy data reported by Italy (wk 28 and 29). Refer to ECDC’s Guidance for representative and targeted genomic SARS-CoV-2 monitoring for more information on recommended sequencing volumes.
ECDC COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker presents information about the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in the EU/EEA.
This is a weekly surveillance report for COVID-19 in the EU/EEA produced by ECDC on 5 August 2021 at 19.15. The data presented here are provisional surveillance data that may be subject to errors and subsequent change.
The report’s aim is to provide an detailed presentation of COVID-19 epidemiology in the EU/EEA using data collected by and submitted to ECDC (see next section). Considerable work still needs to be done to establish and strengthen robust population-based surveillance required to reliably estimate indicators to monitor the intensity, geographical spread, severity and impact of COVID-19 in the EU/EEA.
ECDC’s COVID-19 country overviews is a second weekly surveillance output which provides a concise overview of the evolving epidemiological situation for the COVID-19 pandemic by country, using weekly and daily data from a range of sources.
These two weekly reports present information with reference to the objectives of the ‘Strategies for the surveillance of COVID-19’ (see below). Currently included are data for selected indicators under objectives 1 and 3, together with additional information on data quality in TESSy, descriptive epidemiology of COVID-19 cases reported to TESSy and a description of the national COVID-19 and influenza surveillance systems in the EU/EEA. The scope of these reports may change once more data become available and additional analyses of the existing data have been completed. Surveillance outputs related to objective 2 include ‘ECDC Primer Scan’, which shows primer and probe sequence matches for several publically available real-time PCR assays.
Sections 2-5 of this report contain the following:
ECDC’s legal notice and disclaimer can be found at https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/legal-notice
We present up to five different indicators of severity from two populations of cases:
A case requiring ‘severe hospitalisation’ is one that has been admitted to intensive care and/or required respiratory support.
Figures and tables that simply describe distributions (population pyramids) among cases at different levels of severity include the additional category ‘mild’, which is a case that has not been reported as hospitalised or dead. The inclusion criteria above do not apply to these figures, so all cases reporting the outcome in the dataset are included. ‘Mild’ and the three other categories are mutually exclusive, whereas the same case can be counted in more than one of the other categories (hospitalisation, severe hospitalisation or death).
TESSy data are not complete for all variables. Estimates of rates for severe outcomes (age-sex-period-specific comparisons of cases that have/have not reported the outcome) are based on data from countries with at least 50% completeness for the severity variable and at least 50 cases overall among the relevant population (all cases or hospitalised cases).
Data source: TESSy COVID-19 case-based data
Age-sex distributions of all cases reported at different levels of severity are shown below. Cases reported to TESSy are older than the general population, with very few cases in people aged below 20 years. This reflects the age distribution of people who met the requirements for being tested and is unlikely to reflect the actual distribution of infections in the population. Males and older age groups are over-represented among more severe cases (hospitalised, severely hospitalised or fatal).
Data source: TESSy COVID-19 aggregate data
Age and age-sex-specific attack rates are shown for five indicators of severity across all (a–c) and hospitalised (d–e) cases. The risk of hospitalisation and death increases sharply with age. The reduced risk of severe hospitalisation among the oldest age groups may reflect clinical decisions about the use of limited ICU or ventilator capacity and is a pattern that is observed in many countries. Males have a higher risk of severe outcomes than females, and this sex difference tends to becomes more marked in the older age groups. Values of case-fatality may be underestimated for countries with deaths under-reported relative to cases in TESSy
EuroMOMO, hosted at Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen and supported by ECDC, publishes weekly analyses of all-cause excess mortality (a statistically significant excess compared to expected levels for a given week of the year) every Thursday around noon. The network currently receives data from up to 26 participating countries. Numbers of deaths by age group are shown in a pooled European analysis; individual country curves are also displayed. The number of deaths over the last weeks should be interpreted with caution as adjustments for delayed registrations may be imprecise, but given the challenges with the attribution and reporting of COVID-19-related deaths, all-cause excess mortality can be an important and objective measure of the impact of the pandemic, particularly during periods when competing drivers of excess mortality (influenza and high/low temperatures) are largely absent.
Data sources: TESSy COVID-19 case-based and aggregate data and daily counts of reported cases and reported deaths collected by ECDC epidemic intelligence
The number of cases and deaths reported to TESSy as a proportion of the official figures collected by epidemic intelligence before 10am each day; >100% may be due to TESSy being more up to date than epidemic intelligence or due to duplicate records in TESSy.
Data sources: TESSy COVID-19 case-based data
Variable completeness in case-based data, where completeness is defined as the proportion of records that are not coded as either ‘unknown’ or missing.
Some variables have been constructed by combining information from multiple variables: number_symptoms: number of symptoms reported based on ClinicalSymptoms and ClinicalSymptomsOther; hcw: based on Occupation and HealthcareWorker; hosp: based on Hospitalisation, DateofHospitalisation, IntensiveCare, RespiratorySupport and RespiratorySupportOther; severe: hosp cases who need intensive care and/or respitatory support, dead: based on Outcome and DateOfDeath).
Data sources: TESSy COVID-19 case-based data
An overview of the date information available in case-based TESSy data and any temporal bias in this reporting by country. Understanding how these variables have been reported over time aids interpretation of the delays summarised in the time delays to disease progression section. Some variables, such as date of entry to ICU/HDU, were introduced later on so completeness will be lower. The panel ‘Statistics’ refers to ‘Date used for statistics’, the only mandatory TESSy date variable and which ECDC recommends be used as the date of notification of the case to the national health authorities. This panel therefore indicates the number of cases reported over time as case-based data per country. Some countries that appear to have suddenly stopped have switched to aggregate reporting